Athenea Digital (Mar 2010)

Medición de la conciencia ambiental: Una revisión crítica de la obra de Riley E. Dunlap The measurement of the environmental concern: A critical review of Riley E. Dunlap's work

  • Jose Antonio Cerrillo Vidal

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 0, no. 17
pp. 33 – 52

Abstract

Read online

Despu&eacute;s de un comienzo prometedor en la d&eacute;cada de 1970, la sociolog&iacute;a ambiental se enfrenta a una serie de problemas, derivados principalmente de su incapacidad de vincular comportamientos ambientalistas con los valores declarados en las encuestas (el <em>gap medioambiental</em>). Este estancamiento se debe a la escasa reflexividad te&oacute;rica y metodol&oacute;gica de la disciplina. Aplicando el m&eacute;todo arqueol&oacute;gico, este art&iacute;culo analiza la obra de la principal figura de la sociolog&iacute;a ambiental, Riley E. Dunlap, representativa de la crisis de la especialidad. El individualismo metodol&oacute;gico, la preferencia por el uso de encuestas a poblaci&oacute;n general, la falta de un marco te&oacute;rico fuerte y de atenci&oacute;n a factores estructurales e hist&oacute;ricos, caracter&iacute;sticos del trabajo de Dunlap y sus seguidores, parecen ser las principales causas del bloqueo de la sociolog&iacute;a ambiental, dada su enorme influencia en la disciplina. After a promising beginning in the 1970s, environmental sociology faces a series of problems, derived mainly from its inability to link people's environmental behavior with the values they express in surveys (the <em>environmental gap</em>). This stagnation is due to inadequate theoretical and methodological reflection in the discipline. Applying the archaeological method, this article analyzes the work of the environmental sociologist Riley E. Dunlap, a prominent figure and a representative of the crisis of the discipline. Methodological individualism, the preference for the use of surveys of the general population, the lack of a strong theoretical frame, or of attention to structural and historical factors - all these are faults in the work of Dunlap and his followers. It is these faults that are arguably the main causes of the impasse in which environmental sociology now finds itself.<p>&nbsp;</p> <!--EndFragment-->

Keywords